Thank you for inviting me to be a guest on your blog, Christina. I’m delighted to be here. You’ve asked me some wide-ranging questions; I hope I’ve done them justice!
You describe your novel as an “alternate history thriller” – can you tell us a bit more about that, as it’s not a concept I was familiar with?
Alternate history is based on the idea of “what if”? What if King Harold had won the Battle of Hastings in 1066? Or if Julius Caesar had taken notice of the warning that assassins wanted to murder him on the Ides of March? Sometimes, it can be on the personal level such as in the film Sliding Doors, when the train door shuts and Gwyneth Paltrow’s character splits into two; one gets into the train, the other is left on the platform.
True alternate history stories contain three things: a point of divergence when the alternate timeline split from our own timeline; some description of how that world looks and works; and a logical sequence of how things have changed since the split.
In my book, four hundred Romans trekking north and founding a small colony in the late fourth century changed the whole world: the British didn’t leave North America until 1865, Europe is split into small federated countries. The thriller story – kidnap, death threats, mystery plus romance – takes place against this background.
Does your novel feature any ancient treasures? (I’m very partial to books about those, I have to confess
Haha! Not as such. Their values and way of life is their treasure. But who knows in a later book in the series …
When I was young, I adored Simon Templar ‘The Saint’ by Leslie Charteris. Although he did some morally dubious things, he was one of the good guys and an incurable romantic (I was also reading a lot of Georgette Heyer at the same time which may explain why I went around in a day-dream when younger!).
I think Lee Child, Robert Harris and William Boyd are current favourites for their sheer, sparse style and intelligent plotting. William Boyd’s espionage thriller, Restless, with two strong female leads, is one of the best books I have read. Wandering into historical crime, one of my favourites is Lindsey Davis’ cynical, but good-hearted Roman detective, Falco. I loved Kate Johnson’s The Untied Kingdom, both for its alternate history flavour and the jolly adventure. Although I loved the complexity of Sebastian Faulks’ Charlotte Gray my favourite crime and thriller female character is Eve Dallas written by J D Robb (Nora Roberts).
I understand that you have created a new country/state (well, new world really!) – how difficult was that?
Yes, Roma Nova. It’s huge fun, but it takes a lot of research. Setting a story in the past is a challenge – you know this yourself! And the same is true if your story takes place in another country. But if you invent the country and have to meld it into history that the reader already knows, then your task is doubled. Unless you are writing post-apocalyptic, which is too fantastic for me, you have to make the geography and climate similar to the region where your imagined country lies. I’ll make a confession: I ‘borrowed’ Slovenia as the model. And one of the big things you can’t neglect is the social, economic and political development; this sounds dry, but every living person is a product of their local conditions. Their experience of living in a place and struggle to make sense of it is expressed through their culture.
Do you think it’s possible that any such secret civilisations could exist, hidden away somewhere in the corner of the Earth?
With Google Maps, spy satellites and social media? Sadly, probably not, but it’s a lovely romantic thought. If you set a story before 1939, you could probably get away with it. But now, I think you have to alternate time as I did, if you want to play with that idea.
What pivotal moments in history really interest you and is there one in particular where you wish a different choice had been made, thereby changing the course of things to come?
Oh, what a gift of a question! Thank you. Any historian will give you a full list, but my personal one is when Emperor Julian the Apostate was killed in AD 363 at the Battle of Samarra. He was the last non-Christian ruler of the Roman Empire and wanted to bring the Empire back to its ancient Roman values to save it from dissolution.
His laws tended to target wealthy and educated Christians. Julian’s aim was not to destroy Christianity but to drive the religion out of the governing classes of the empire. He was well-educated, a clever and successful military commander, an able administrator and a survivor of lethal imperial family politics. He was only 31 when he died. You could draw a parallel with the death of JFK in 1963. Would that clever and talented leader have gone on to great things or would his own brilliance have been his downfall? If Julian had lived, would he have rolled back Christianity? A big “what if”!
You are obviously very fond of the Romans – why them in particular?
Strange, isn’t it, when they weren’t exactly a feminist bunch? Rome was founded in 753BC by riff-raff led, according to the legend, by Romulus and Remus and ended in the west in AD476. That’s an impressive 1229 years, seven hundred years of which Rome was the most politically important, richest, and largest city in the Western world. I don’t want to copy the John Cleese speech in The Life of Brian “What have the Romans ever done for us?” so I won’t go on about baths, transport, trade, architecture, etc.
Throughout kingdom, republic, principate and dominate empire they were a regulated and military society. They aspired to the highest values of service to the state and civic virtue. Although ideal Roman family life included the lowest status members of society, such slaves were the most fortunate. Repugnant to us now, all ancient, medieval and early modern societies and some even in the 20th century, used slavery as an economic force.
Corruption was rife in most periods, but the Romans developed systems of law, politics and taxation as well as the principle of the rule of law and for over two hundred years established the Pax Romana. Literary arts, learning, technology, engineering and the decorative arts flourished. But the impressive thing is the complexity of their civil and economic as well as military life, multiculturalism and scientific engineering.
Their attitude to women was legally repressive, but towards the later period, it changed considerable with much more freedom to act, trade and own property. Divorce was easy, but adultery could be fatal. And there are many accounts of women owning and running businesses of all types. As you know, history is not all it seems to be in the public perception.
Are you good at Latin and did you enjoy learning it at school?
Am I going to take a Roman attitude and say yes, I was top most of the time, or a British one and say, well, actually, I wasn’t too bad at it? I loved it, especially the rude and sexually explicit poems of Catullus…
Thank you so much for answering my questions, Alison – it all sounds absolutely fascinating and I can’t wait to read Inceptio!
Blurb for INCEPTIO:-
New York – present day alternate reality. Karen Brown, angry and frightened after surviving a kidnap attempt, has a harsh choice – being eliminated by government enforcer Jeffery Renschman or fleeing to the mysterious Roma Nova, her dead mother’s homeland in Europe.
Founded sixteen centuries ago by Roman exiles and ruled by women, Roma Nova gives Karen safety and a ready-made family. But a shocking discovery about her new lover, the fascinating but arrogant special forces officer Conrad Tellus who rescued her in America, isolates her.
Renschman reaches into her new home and nearly kills her. Recovering, she is desperate to find out why he is hunting her so viciously. Unable to reply on anybody else, she undergoes intensive training, develops fighting skills and becomes an undercover cop. But crazy with bitterness at his past failures, Renschman sets a trap for her, knowing she has no choice but to spring it…
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.